MANILA, Philippines — The Supreme Court has denied a request for a special protective order, known as writ of amparo, filed on behalf of former presidential spokesperson Harry Roque by his daughter.
Supreme Court spokesperson Camille Ting explained that the writ Roque hoped could be his recourse does not apply to his situation.
“The scope of amparo is limited to extra-judicial killings and threats thereof, which is not present in this case,” Ting said at a press conference on Tuesday, October 1.
The court, however, has required the House of Representatives joint quadpartite committee to comment on a separate petition for prohibition.
What is writ of amparo? It is a procedural instrument and legal remedy that allows individuals to seek immediate court protection when they believe their basic rights are being violated or are under threat. It is considered an extraordinary measure.
Before the decision
Roque has been in a legal dispute with the House quad committee over his alleged involvement with Chinese-operated scam operations in the Philippines, known as POGOs.
The panel has been attempting to compel Roque to attend hearings and submit documents. It is conducting an inquiry into POGOs and their possible links to illegal drugs and crime, as well as their connections to the administration of former president Rodrigo Duterte, during which Roque served as a Malacañang official.
Roque has yet to surface since lawmakers cited him for contempt twice and ordered his detention in mid-September.
The petition for prohibition, which the Supreme Court is now seeking comment on, requests the court to prevent the House committee from compelling Roque’s attendance. — based on reports from Ian Laqui
