Last August, I had the privilege of attending two significant events in Taiwan: the Asia Pacific School of Internet Governance (APSIG) 2024 at the National Taiwan University, and the Asia Pacific Regional Internet Governance Forum (APrIGF). These gatherings offered insightful discussions on the current state and future of internet governance in the Asia-Pacific region. Here, I’ll share some of my key takeaways and insights from both conferences.
Navigating the Complexities of Misinformation and Digital Inclusion
During APSIG, I participated in Flash Talks, where I spoke about two critical topics: digital inclusion and the evolving nature of misinformation. With new disruptive trends like AI, misinformation has become even harder to combat, particularly in regions that struggle to adopt policy-level interventions swiftly. I noted three key points:
- Funding for Fact-Checking: There is a stark imbalance in global media and journalism funding, with Asia receiving a disproportionately small share.
- Media Consumption Trends: Audiences are increasingly drawn to entertaining media content, often at the expense of the integrity of the information they consume.
- Media Literacy: We need to strengthen media literacy efforts and forge alliances with powerful stakeholders—governments and tech firms—that have the capacity for robust interventions.
On digital inclusion, I addressed the challenge of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Many initiatives appear to serve only as lip service, rather than truly integrating marginalized voices. I emphasized that reaching the “last mile” of media literacy, particularly in underserved communities, requires regional-level policies, partnerships, and collaborations. As my colleague J. Rukmal pointed out, providing marginalized groups with a seat at the table isn’t enough; ensuring their voices are heard and acted upon is crucial.
Reflecting on Governance: Ensuring Accessibility and Representation
At the Asia Pacific Regional Internet Governance Forum (APrIGF), I highlighted the importance of using international conferences as a platform for self-assessment. As advocates for balanced gender representation and accessibility in decision-making spaces, we must hold ourselves accountable. This includes ensuring that all attendees, especially those with specific needs, can fully participate, and eliminating classism in spaces where we advocate for equal opportunities.
Sustainability and Internet Governance
One of the notable presentations at APSIG focused on the environmental impact of the internet, proposing eco-friendly solutions to minimize its carbon footprint. It was inspiring to see initiatives like the .Asia domain contributing to digital inclusion and internet sustainability as part of the global sustainable development agenda.
Additionally, discussions around the need for multilingual internet services through Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) highlighted the importance of a more inclusive internet. Universal Acceptance (UA) initiatives were also explored, focusing on ensuring software compatibility with all domain names and email addresses, irrespective of script or length.
Tackling Emerging Challenges: Cybercrime and Digital Sovereignty
Cybercrime was a recurring topic, with experts drawing parallels between the rapid evolution of cyber threats and the spread of viruses. A call for stronger collaboration between ISPs, law enforcement, and policymakers was emphasized. Meanwhile, the rise of digital sovereignty—where nations prioritize their own internet policies over global governance frameworks—was identified as a growing challenge, especially in the context of the ongoing geopolitical tensions between major powers like the US and China.
The Path Forward: Multi-Stakeholderism and Regional Collaboration
Both APSIG and APrIGF underscored the importance of multi-stakeholderism in shaping the future of internet governance. This approach ensures that decisions are made collectively by governments, civil society, businesses, and technical experts, thus maintaining an open and robust internet.
Yet, the model is not without its challenges. As the governance landscape becomes more complex, with overlapping roles and increasing geopolitical tensions, it is essential that stakeholders work together to preserve the unique properties of the internet: openness, accessibility, and global interconnectedness.
The 2024 APSIG and APrIGF provided valuable platforms for dialogue, collaboration, and learning. These discussions are critical as we continue to shape the future of internet governance in the Asia-Pacific region. I am grateful for the opportunity to contribute to these conversations and look forward to seeing how these insights will inform future policies and initiatives across the region.
